Saturday, May 11, 2013

Mets future is bright

It was obvious that one team in New York was going to have some big changes sweep through the organization. When Omar Minaya started a spending spree which included; Jason Bay, Johan Santana, Oliver Perez and others. It was questioned because these were players who were near or past their prime. These moves cap strapped the team down and they all the signings backfired. To add insult to injury the team received news that members of the front office were declaring bankruptcy being Bernie Madkoff.

So what followed was many smart business moves which included Minaya departing. This left a organization in a semi rebuilding mode. They dealt Carlos Beltran and brought back Zack Wheeler who was considered the top pitching prospect in baseball. Another key move was drafting North Carolina pitcher Matt Harvey, who was a good prospect who needed to work on his offspeed pitches to be in the pros. Last season was bad and led to the trade of Dickey and they let Reyes go. In return for Dickey came highly regarded catcher Travis d'Arnaud and pitcher Noah Syndergaard who has been making some noise. Another young arm is Rafael Montero and also Michael Fulmer who both posted good era and strike out totals. Brandon Nimmo has been hitting good so far and seems like a possible outfielder of the future.

The Mets are in position to make some noise in the 2014 season, as this year is more of a trial run. Harvey is surprising everyone with his command and strikeout numbers. It seems Wheeler will come up next year in full, but needs gametime this year for experience. The likes of Ike Davis and Lucas Duda are important pieces who are struggling to perform. Pitching wise they will compete, but the performance will come down to how well the offense will come together. 

Friday, May 10, 2013

NFL defensive schemes

I guess it shouldn't be a surprise that as a Patriot fan that I favor a couple packages I have seen the Pats run over the years. I personally believe that the 34 defense is the stronger base defense compared to a 43, and I heavily favor the 1-5-5 sub nickel package as well in passing downs.

Let's first examine what the 34 defense is built for. You base your team around an "anchor" defensive (nose) tackle to take on multiple blockers and cover multiple gaps. In many cases they do the dirty work to help free up opportunities at the next level of the defense. They are more built for pure strength then for more of a speed rush ability. This also is a characteristic that the defensive ends are created for. They have a bit more flexibility not having to be pure run stuffers, but they also use gap control. They need to dictate changing the runners lane to inside or outside depending on what the defensive call is. You usually don't see how sack totals for any of the lineman. Your linebackers feed off of what the line creates. Your outside linebackers are in control of sealing off a runner to break outside, and kick the play back in. In passing downs they in many cases bring pressure,  but can be used in zone coverage. The inside linebackers rack up a lot of tackles if the nose tackle does his job. Their responsibility is shutting down interior movement. In passing down they can be left in zone of man coverage on a tight end of running back.

I feel there is a greater advantage when running the 34 defense compared to a 43 defense. You have more speed on the field, having an extra linebacker over a lineman. This allows you to have more zone defense, and can run the risk of man coverage with safety help deep. In many cases, even against the run you're outside linebacker has good enough size to engage and contain run plays. It also creates more unique blitz packages allowing you to overload a side, or cross your middle linebackers with a delayed blitz.

A under the radar formation I like is a sub nickel package, the 1-5-5. Used is longer passing downs, it is thrown in a couple times a game. You're only using one defensive lineman, with five linebackers. When you use this, the linebackers usually are constantly moving before the snap creating confusion on who is blitzing and who drops out in coverage. This leads the quarterback into calling a play without a full knowledge of what the defense will do. Once again you have better speed on the field, with a single lineman and many linebackers. It gives flexibility in what kind of blitz and coverage schemes you run.

Even though I favor these techniques, it truly comes down to what personal each team has. You can't run a system most players aren't familiar with or moving a player to a position they aren't known for. In many cases a outside linebacker is looked at a defensive end or vise versa depending on their size. Strategy and game planning have a major factor in determining what you run from week to week. Having the ability to practice and use multiple defenses at all stages of a game increases the success rate of the team.